I'm already busy looking after my own personal issues and I have no time to play meta games with yall, I just want Furlanìe to be neutral and safe and go on with stuff I actually enjoy, which is RPing economy and small scale meetings and interactions. Therfore, before I decide to just take some time off and come back in the future, let's try to solve this in an orderly way. Serenierre">@Serenierre Montedoro has no reason whatsoever to be hostile with me other than just "for the lulz" which I'm not interested in at all, we need to agree on a common position on this to get along. @Etruria we don't get along that much, but I've tried my best to reinforce the friendly relationship that Furlanìe and Etruria should have for historic and cultural reasons I don't need to highlight. Your decision, for example, to put to vote on the suspension of the agreement between ODS and Furlanìe just minutes after I wrote a communication to Eiffelland that you shouldn't have seen IC proves that you have no intention to help me in my objective, so, I'm not sure what to do with you, you just want to be my enemy? There is nothing I can do to change your mind? @Eiffelland as we agreed a bunch of months ago, your French minority is there because of the historic trade and cultural exchange between Eif-Ret and northern Gallia through the free city of Tergest firstly, and Furlanìe now, so deciding to cut all cooperation with me needs to have a negative effect on your economy too, having just me suffering from market losses while you can just ignore the consequences totally brakes the game to me, and I'm really disappointed by this. Auraria">@Auraria I shouldn't have left the gallian meeting, but I was really insicure and was convinced by some unwanted rumors that you were acting against me behind my back, and of course I lost my mind there as usual. If you reassure me that you are not biased like Lars, and open to changes, I will work harder to try to solve ICly our nations issues to come to a normalisation of our relations, which was my goal from the start, I just don't want to lose more time in useless efforts that I could invest otherwise. @Etruria @Eiffelland @Johnston Isle and Natal">@Natal I guess: I can't go on RPing if there is no common ground on what the truth is. The Ivar-Grau understanding is a non aggression and trade agreement with kadikistan, the rurikgrad pact is mentioned by the treaty as an example of the level of access my companies have, not as part of the agreement. The IGU was just my latest attempt to find a safe place for Furlanìe, the agreement has been made to have a solid dialogue with the most prominent member of the pact and therfore avoid the possibility of a large communist alliance attacking me while the ODS talks about how large will need to be the shoes that its representatives will need to wear for the meeting where they will decide when to hold a meeting. Not a shift in geopolitics, I can understand part of the IC reactions, but reading more and more sentences about the pact and polesia and my companies just giving up eiffelland blueprints to kadikistan (so they can lose a profitable and crucial eiffellander partner? Makes no sense to me) I'm starting to see some behind the doors communications and coordination which I really do not like. Unless we all agree on what is true and what is false, going on talking has no meaning.