What's new

Another map poll, wow

Which map do you prefer?

  • Coro's map

    Votes: 1 4.5%
  • Kyles' map

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ulst's map

    Votes: 11 50.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 6 27.3%
  • No preference

    Votes: 4 18.2%

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Socialist Commonwealth

Establishing Nation
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
4,697
Location
Germany
Capital
Svetograd
Nick
Revy
I don't see the need to rule out Bantu in southern Himyar completely if players show up who are interested in playing a black African nation, I'm only saying that most of Occidentia could easily be transplanted to Himyar by assuming there are large areas there that were depopulated by European diseases and colonial violence similiar to what happened in America, so that the colonial state that developed there are entirely European in nature.
 

Touzen

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
9,487
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Capital
Shinkyô
Nick
Xen
As for contained world or not, I'd think the rest of the world could exist, so that we can expand the map in an unlikely future of crass overdemand requiring us to open up new map space. Maybe it could even be referenced in special events and such, while keeping the focus on the Europe and its surroundings area depicted by the map.
 

Rheinbund

Established Nation
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
11,828
Location
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Capital
Fehrbellin
I realize that. Mine was just an attempt to weed out the option that is attached to a frustrated mapmaker that in the future will make one or two updates, but than realizes all the requests and complaints are too much and just gives up on it, leaving us with nothing. I think we've got a good thing going now. There is hardly any rp here anyway. Maybe I should have just said that :p

Ehm, I already said that there is something being brewed around the Long Sea :razz: Please check with Auraria, Sikandara, Edessine Empire, Ovi and me :razz:

And therefore, I think it would be better if we stick for the current map at least for now and see how things will go. We can always turn Northern Hymiar into an extension of Eurodisney, or the areas east of current Eurodisney.

EDIT: And with all due respect, this kind of discussions is sucking up time available for RPing :razz:
 

Thaumantica

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,032
Location
Grasstown ND
Capital
Caitekurke
Nick
Nilshanks
EDIT: And with all due respect, this kind of discussions is sucking up time available for RPing :razz:

Which is why I tried to put any overhaul that isn't coming tomorrow, next week, or any time soon on the backburner for at least the summer.



I've been wondering on the merits and demerits of waiting though, because some people might just wait out the whole summer or kind of relax during this time knowing that a change is coming. Then I started to wonder about whether it's comfortable for people to think the map is FOREVER . . Then I stopped to think about it all because I don't know. In any case I still suggest a map team, that we wait until Coro is back, Davy too, and this Ulst character so they can collaborate.
 

Rheinbund

Established Nation
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
11,828
Location
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Capital
Fehrbellin
Well, there are more than enough plans for RPs. Let's close this discussion as soon as possible and meanwhile RP further, or develop more RP plans.

EDIT: Or let's start with the plans already present.
 

Salen

Establishing Nation
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
311
Capital
Heerndal
Nick
Salen
I simply want to state the following: for the past few weeks there has been the debate that a map revision would be beneficial to increase role-play as some areas on the map are inactive or less crowded as others. We all know this will always be the case, no matter what map type you're using. A new map will certainly therefore not solve all issues but on the other hand I do think the status quo will be less helpful. So, we'd have to take measures eventually, right? =) We all want to stimulate role-play in one way or another!

The thing is, my current map proposal isn't something new anyway. Okay, boundaries might be different but the overall layout and general features resemble our current map. It's only made smaller in proportion to strengthen inter-regional ties and thus it is a more 'distilled edition' in a way that it is more adjacent, so it would stimulate possible role-play scenario's. Basically existing role-play scenarios are as easily applicable to this draft, so in the meanwhile we can just continue our plots. And additionally as you all know there's a shift in size concerning the continents - to correspond with the actual needs (i.e. the number of players willing to play in a certain area). So just an overall statement why I do think it would be good to use this template, whilst not yet fully finished/fitted to everyone's liking.

Though nothing is binding and that we all agree - and so do I - that we ought to focus or would like to return to extensively role-playing again; we might have to consider some interference or adaptations in the near or distant future nonetheless. So yes, hopefully we can continue our writing without getting caught up in endless conversation - I am applauding decisive action over here! ; )

Moreover, concerning what to preserve or what to drop in terms of land: we could hold a general survey of what people in a first and/or second option would like to play (European? Asian? What ideology or state? etc.)? And finally, perhaps we could develop a system in which every player could have a 'main nation' and up to two secondary nations. We all sometimes have the urge to switch skins now, don't we; so this could perhaps lessen the number of players suddenly moving or overhauling their nation. =)
 

Khemia

Establishing Nation
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
2,837
Location
Hawaii
Nick
Saaya
Which is why I tried to put any overhaul that isn't coming tomorrow, next week, or any time soon on the backburner for at least the summer.



I've been wondering on the merits and demerits of waiting though, because some people might just wait out the whole summer or kind of relax during this time knowing that a change is coming. Then I started to wonder about whether it's comfortable for people to think the map is FOREVER . . Then I stopped to think about it all because I don't know. In any case I still suggest a map team, that we wait until Coro is back, Davy too, and this Ulst character so they can collaborate.
As an "Asian" nation, it is difficult finding the motivation to move forward with some of my planned RP knowing that it could be wiped off the map. I don't mind changing nations if the map doesn't allow me to continue as Yujin, but it's difficult to get back to active and push forward with something more intensive than news RP with the uncertainty hanging over everything.
Moreover, concerning what to preserve or what to drop in terms of land: we could hold a general survey of what people in a first and/or second option would like to play (European? Asian? What ideology or state? etc.)? And finally, perhaps we could develop a system in which every player could have a 'main nation' and up to two secondary nations. We all sometimes have the urge to switch skins now, don't we; so this could perhaps lessen the number of players suddenly moving or overhauling their nation. =)
The general survey should allow people to vote for more than one item. Individuals like me are just as able to play Asian as other nations, though I prefer Chinese I also really enjoy MENA region countries and can even do something S.E. European.
 

Salen

Establishing Nation
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
311
Capital
Heerndal
Nick
Salen
As an "Asian" nation, it is difficult finding the motivation to move forward with some of my planned RP knowing that it could be wiped off the map. I don't mind changing nations if the map doesn't allow me to continue as Yujin, but it's difficult to get back to active and push forward with something more intensive than news RP with the uncertainty hanging over everything.

And so is the case for my Heroquoian project; thought it would be somewhat original and subsequently a bit more exciting to play with than the standard European country. I could keep/return to my Ulstland but I'd rather focus on Heroquoia.
 

Oneida

Established Nation
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
1,414
Location
Pennsylvania
Capital
Solis
Nick
Jurzidentia
I don't want to be that guy, but it seems like this is the third time a majority has voted to change the map and it has not happened.
 

Khemia

Establishing Nation
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
2,837
Location
Hawaii
Nick
Saaya
You must be registered for see images


Let's not forget this thread was intended to consolidate discussion, not actually implement change. They're putting their fingers to the pulse of the forum before they make a change.
 

Pelasgia

Established Nation
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
4,280
Location
Athens, Greece
Nick
Demos
Given the fact that a major RP is being brewed (troubles between Auraria and Sikandara), I think it would be best to keep the current map, on second thought. We will see how to fill up the empty spaces. I know that Eurodisney is a popular location for most countries, but then let's decide that a larger part of the continent Eurodisney is situated on will be considered Eurodisney.

I agree on that.
 

Caelia

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
5,620
Capital
Yinjing
Nick
Kyiv
There a lot of nations that need to be removed for inactivity. So more Eurodisney may not even be necessary.
 

Touzen

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
9,487
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Capital
Shinkyô
Nick
Xen


If I'm not mistaken, those are the nations that will be gone in that area after the inactives are removed. It doesn't look much better in the rest of the world. Basically, clustering is very urgently needed. The rest of us need to be close to each other and interact with each other more. It's entire pointless to spread ourselves thin across the world.
 

Caelia

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
5,620
Capital
Yinjing
Nick
Kyiv


If I'm not mistaken, those are the nations that will be gone in that area after the inactives are removed. It doesn't look much better in the rest of the world. Basically, clustering is very urgently needed. The rest of us need to be close to each other and interact with each other more. It's entire pointless to spread ourselves thin across the world.

:eek2:

It's worse than I thought.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
211
Location
Canada
Capital
Jingbao
Jesus christ that's a lot of free room.

What's the criteria for being inactive and removed again? How long have all of those players been inactive?

I think Portusgalia posted recently but I don't think it was a IC/RP post.
 
Last edited:

Salen

Establishing Nation
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
311
Capital
Heerndal
Nick
Salen
What about nations like Ostveg, Nichstein, Twente and Coeurléon?
 

Thaumantica

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,032
Location
Grasstown ND
Capital
Caitekurke
Nick
Nilshanks
I remove based on a 60+ day last RP post or 30+ day last OOC post/logged in, and then don't remove people who have absence thread or general absence posts. Granted though I've let a few slip for a long time with being busy. Later today or tonight I want to go through and apply that basic rule and see what happens. It'll be a big purge, but not as large as the map above unless we want to adopt stricter rules than this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top