What's new

Radilo Map Challenges

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thaumantica

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,032
Location
Grasstown ND
Capital
Caitekurke
Nick
Nilshanks
Given the kerfuffle on the @San Jose & @Radilo project I wanted to clarify a major point that was brought up by @Remuria:

These two players did plan their project off board and then presented it in a world building thread and a map application. Such arrangements are as old as PMs, IRC, and now discord. A private arrangement means nothing until its on the board, obviously, and once it's posted that is the time to challenge . . . But characterizing pre-planning a post or application as inherently wrong is ridiculous.

Avenues of challenging exist but are perhaps not obvious. One could message the mapmaker or staff, but given much of the staff either plays or is inactive that's not always easiest (understandable). Alternatively you could start a thread discussion in this open forum called the Map Room . . . Like this thread is. But you would want to rationalize your objections and not use quitting as an immediate chip on the table.

I find some things personally troubling about what Radilo and San Jose are doing, but not so much that I would challenge it, but if I did it would go something like this:

  • San Jose the nation was supposed to on the map cede islands to Radilo anyways and they would be regional neighbors. If they wanted to RP together this was already in the works and just needed to be reflected on the map. There are so many changes going on there already prior to this that it's impossible to keep up with . . So "please, one at a time guys?"
  • I like the idea of two players working on one nation together, however, Radilo is already a several island nation - combining this tandem player event with new colonies or expansion on the map is an unproven double dip. Why wouldn't they play with what they already have first to see if it works?
  • If I were Remuria or a player more directly impacted I would also worry that since Jose as a player does change or move on a lot, I am actually just agreeing or watching Radilo the nation and player expand. If Jose disappears from the project in a few months then I am again just dealing with Radilo and none of that other stuff mattered.
The thing is though Remuria's challenge was to Jose being an RP neighbor under the arrangement of Radilo and he roleplaying together, not so much about the pixels elsewhere. It is sort of a personal attack rather than on any of the mechanisms. I am a habitual nation changer myself and chide folks like Ovi or Jose the same for changing too often more, so I get it, and there's always been a bad connotation about changing nations because of what it does to continuity.

In this case though: there needs to be explained reasons why this particular application will impact continuity or make the game difficult or "un-fun" to play because Radilo and Jose are sharing duties. @Remuria was right to say they'd walk it off for a few days. Before I saw all of this I told Jose to maybe start the RP itself and be sure before account name changing for a week. I did not guess a week ago that San Jose would go to siesta mode or dormant for this while it was churning out posts, so stepping away and thinking about things before switching or saying you're going to quit can be helpful.
 

Josepania

Establishing Nation
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
7,676
Location
Los Angeles
Capital
Palmira
Nick
Jose
  • San Jose the nation was supposed to on the map cede islands to Radilo anyways and they would be regional neighbors. If they wanted to RP together this was already in the works and just needed to be reflected on the map. There are so many changes going on there already prior to this that it's impossible to keep up with . . So "please, one at a time guys?"
  • I like the idea of two players working on one nation together, however, Radilo is already a several island nation - combining this tandem player event with new colonies or expansion on the map is an unproven double dip. Why wouldn't they play with what they already have first to see if it works?
  • If I were Remuria or a player more directly impacted I would also worry that since Jose as a player does change or move on a lot, I am actually just agreeing or watching Radilo the nation and player expand. If Jose disappears from the project in a few months then I am again just dealing with Radilo and none of that other stuff mattered.

These points in particular are fair, and I would've been happy to address them and go more into detail with them if that's how this all began... but we're kind of past that.

For some context, at least on my end this was a decision motivated by impulse and excitement to experiment with something new, or at least not done since I last RPed a shared nation with Zalonarus many, many years ago. Some of the motivation also came from the knowledge that my corner of the map was expected to be relatively inactive in the near future due to player absence and change of interest in secondary nations.

I'm not going to lie: I've been quite discouraged by the very vehement response to this proposal. Again, I would have been open to addressing concerns and grievances with the concept and adjusted accordingly, as I don't intend on being that level of chaotic. But the manner in which Remuria has gone about this is disappointing, to say the least, and I am gravely offended by them essentially saying, based on my perception, that they do not wish to have me located anywhere near them. That's as far as I'll go in that regard because I don't want to cause further drama, but I want it to be known that I'm quite hurt and offended by how this was handled.

I don't intend on rocking the boat any further, and am currently in the process of reflecting on how this has all unfolded. For the record, I don't intend on quitting or anything, I'm obviously not gonna go that far, but I do kind of want to reassess how to proceed from here.
 

Remuria

Establishing Nation
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
2,640
Nick
The Swissman
That's the point @San Jose

An impulse by yourself acted upon by an impulse from myself.

This is about maybe half if not more members of the board who hop on to new concepts so often it hurts to count, and who never stand to the challenge of evolving their initial concept rather than jumping to something else.

Furthermore, I reject the appeal that you and Radilo were amenable to hearing someone out.

To let others speak out, please first post your concept in public, let others post to hear the other players out. If you just post as if it was a done deal, please expect a negative reaction.

Radilo reached out to me via PM and remained the proverbial wall against which to smash my proverbial bag of beans against. This was not a nice discussion, neither for me, nor for him.

I was quite hostile to the good old IRClique back in the day, I stay true to myself concerning Discord.

In the end, you have been discouraged by me, I have been demotivated by you and Radilo.
 
Last edited:

Thaumantica

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,032
Location
Grasstown ND
Capital
Caitekurke
Nick
Nilshanks
The IRC/Discord to Forum player divide is again nearly as old as the forum. I'm only here since like 07 or something when the IRC was already there. You @Remuria had a right to challenge and discuss their proposition, but you might want to admit that immediately threatening to quit or ignore cannon them based on their application was a poor challenge?

I suppose they could have made a world build thread that asked for discussion and then waited, but they packaged it on the same day or so with the map application (a map that is updated quarterly basically) . . . which did not make it a done deal. Posting both at the same general time also isn't abnormal, I've done the same basically before of doing the build thread and map app the same day.
 

Josepania

Establishing Nation
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
7,676
Location
Los Angeles
Capital
Palmira
Nick
Jose
That's the point @San Jose

An impulse by yourself acted upon by an impulse from myself.

This is about maybe half if not more members of the board who hop on to new concepts so often it hurts to count, and who never stand to the challenge of evolving their initial concept rather than jumping to something else.

Furthermore, I reject the appeal that you and Radilo were amenable to hearing someone out.

To let others speak out, please first post your concept in public, let others post to hear the other players out. If you just post as if it was a done deal, please expect a negative reaction.

Radilo reached out to me via PM and remained the proverbial wall against which to smash my proverbial bag of beans against. This was not a nice discussion, neither for me, nor for him.

I was quite hostile to the good old IRClique back in the day, I stay true to myself concerning Discord.

In the end, you have been discouraged by me, I have been demotivated by you and Radilo.
I am hopeful that the following project thread is an improvement to this whole affair and brings down the hostility a bit:

 

Remuria

Establishing Nation
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
2,640
Nick
The Swissman
The IRC/Discord to Forum player divide is again nearly as old as the forum. I'm only here since like 07 or something when the IRC was already there. You @Remuria had a right to challenge and discuss their proposition, but you might want to admit that immediately threatening to quit or ignore cannon them based on their application was a poor challenge?

I suppose they could have made a world build thread that asked for discussion and then waited, but they packaged it on the same day or so with the map application (a map that is updated quarterly basically) . . . which did not make it a done deal. Posting both at the same general time also isn't abnormal, I've done the same basically before of doing the build thread and map app the same day.

This was the only challenge presented to me when faced with a made decision. Poor challenge or worthy challenge remains in the eye of the beholder. What matters to me is that I challenged.

Plus I suggest you read back on my posts. My "deal with it" came after an exchange and when it came apparent that the initial plan was a "done deal". Not as a first reaction. So I shall be blunt and state that I do not see any impartiality. This is my personal impression.

Instead of continously blaming everything on me and grilling me for standing my ground, I suggest that you take it upon yourself as a member of the administration and really go and flesh out some rules around the publicity of this kind of... thing.

Because I will stand my ground when pushed, I will be blunt and I shall not regret it.
 
Last edited:

Thaumantica

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,032
Location
Grasstown ND
Capital
Caitekurke
Nick
Nilshanks
This was the only challenge presented to me when faced with a made decision. Poor challenge or worthy challenge remains in the eye of the beholder. What matters to me is that I challenged.

Plus I suggest you read back on my posts. My "deal with it" came after an exchange and when it came apparent that the initial plan was a "done deal". Not as a first reaction. So I shall be blunt and state that I do not see any impartiality. This is my personal impression.

Instead of continously blaming everything on me and grilling me for standing my ground, I suggest that you take it upon yourself as a member of the administration and really go and flesh out some rules around the publicity of this kind of... thing.

Because I will stand my ground when pushed, I will be blunt and I shall not regret it.

You are hard like diamond and will survive. I do agree that a "done deal" response is awful to any concerns and apologize for generalizing your challenge to the quitting bit. You had the original merited point of concerns that an inconsistent player would disrupt your longer arc.

Concerning a rule for map claim challenges I think that the community voting system could achieve this, and someone like you or anyone else reading this should draft a proposed rule for that in this forum:

There was contention regarding Xen's map challenges a few years ago and for that reason we do not want to dictate a rule on this matter but it has been discussed from time to time. If we dictated a robust map challenge rule it could be interpreted as preferential to him or to us so I think I speak on our behalf in saying we would prefer the community vote its own rule into place.

Since Jose and Radilo altered their world build plan which you are not challenging, and presumably no one will, I am going to lock this thread. #BeBest
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top