Polesia
Established Nation
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2006
- Messages
- 5,741
- Capital
- Amstov
- Nick
- Norse
Di Tsayt
Active servicemen demand right to vote
AMSTOV - The government is facing another battle in the Supreme Court after lawyers representing an undisclosed number of on-duty military personnel lodged an appeal against the ban on voting for active servicemen.
The ban dates back to the establishment of the Free State, when the Founders wanted to ensure the armed forces would remain a politically neutral, non-partisan institution. At the time, the military was being formed from different partisan groups that fought in the Independence War, sometimes against each other. Removing the right to vote for those serving was seen as a means of preventing soldiers and generals getting back involved in politics.
Recently the ban has come under criticism for effectively denying suffrage to thousands of young conscripts who are enrolled each year after school or university. Prisoners are the only other section of society not allowed to vote. Veterans and reservists both still have the right.
"The current rules are an affront to democracy," declared Berl Sheiman, one of the lawyers arguing against the ban, "if anyone is deserving of the vote, it is the brave men defending this country."
Previous governments had considered overturning the voting restrictions, but never went ahead with their plans, fearing a defeat in the National Assembly.
But now the ruling Social Democratic Alliance faces an opposition supportive of extending the suffrage to servicemen, with the armed forces have grown increasingly hostile the Social Democrats' foreign and defence policies.
Senior officers openly lobby the government for more military spending, while demobilised troops played a leading role in the protests against Chancellor Alexander Kahnemann after he called for a speedy normalisation of ties with Kadikistan not long after it threatened to invade.
All the opposition parties now want the voting ban quashed by the Supreme Court. This is the second major legal fight the government has faced during the election campaign, having successfully fought off a challenge by a number of smaller radical parties recently disbanded for unconstitutional activities.
The Social Democrats are reportedly confident the ban will be upheld, but many fear a restless military post-election, especially if the result is close, could prove a dangerous opponent.
"The army has thrown its weight around before... it could do it again," worries one Social Democratic backbencher.
Active servicemen demand right to vote
AMSTOV - The government is facing another battle in the Supreme Court after lawyers representing an undisclosed number of on-duty military personnel lodged an appeal against the ban on voting for active servicemen.
The ban dates back to the establishment of the Free State, when the Founders wanted to ensure the armed forces would remain a politically neutral, non-partisan institution. At the time, the military was being formed from different partisan groups that fought in the Independence War, sometimes against each other. Removing the right to vote for those serving was seen as a means of preventing soldiers and generals getting back involved in politics.
Recently the ban has come under criticism for effectively denying suffrage to thousands of young conscripts who are enrolled each year after school or university. Prisoners are the only other section of society not allowed to vote. Veterans and reservists both still have the right.
"The current rules are an affront to democracy," declared Berl Sheiman, one of the lawyers arguing against the ban, "if anyone is deserving of the vote, it is the brave men defending this country."
Previous governments had considered overturning the voting restrictions, but never went ahead with their plans, fearing a defeat in the National Assembly.
But now the ruling Social Democratic Alliance faces an opposition supportive of extending the suffrage to servicemen, with the armed forces have grown increasingly hostile the Social Democrats' foreign and defence policies.
Senior officers openly lobby the government for more military spending, while demobilised troops played a leading role in the protests against Chancellor Alexander Kahnemann after he called for a speedy normalisation of ties with Kadikistan not long after it threatened to invade.
All the opposition parties now want the voting ban quashed by the Supreme Court. This is the second major legal fight the government has faced during the election campaign, having successfully fought off a challenge by a number of smaller radical parties recently disbanded for unconstitutional activities.
The Social Democrats are reportedly confident the ban will be upheld, but many fear a restless military post-election, especially if the result is close, could prove a dangerous opponent.
"The army has thrown its weight around before... it could do it again," worries one Social Democratic backbencher.