Since the Solaren faith is becoming more important in roleplay with several players mentioning it, Zeek a while back raised the issue that it is not well defined and used quite differently by different people. So maybe it is worth talking about.
Right now we have the interpretation of the Solaris Church being an openly ISIL-like terrorist group (with cells getting arrested, planning attacks etc.) coexisting with an interpretation that shows them as a fringe movement, but not openly violent (yet). Sometimes it is part of the Tiburan Church, sometimes it is not and claims legitimacy: Being part of the Church while having their own Pope Urban seems difficult, for example. Maybe it isn't even unified, and some groups do this, while others do that? In any case, a lot to think about here.
I have always vaguely thought that the Solaren church was a group that had a problem with Vatican II and is basically the St. Pius Society if they went Wahabi - not necessarily all of them are terrorists, but it is an ideology that is extreme, religiously reactionary and might be explicitly or implicitly promoting Jihadism/Crusaderism depending on whom you ask. I think there is also a more Cathar-like interpretation by Cervia, where they have been around for a while.
My proposal would be that others write their understanding as well, so that we can then synergize the movement's nature into a post/wiki article. It might well turn out to be an umbrella of movements, just like ISIL and AQ have in large parts become franchise terror brands under which anyone willing to claim association can act.
Right now we have the interpretation of the Solaris Church being an openly ISIL-like terrorist group (with cells getting arrested, planning attacks etc.) coexisting with an interpretation that shows them as a fringe movement, but not openly violent (yet). Sometimes it is part of the Tiburan Church, sometimes it is not and claims legitimacy: Being part of the Church while having their own Pope Urban seems difficult, for example. Maybe it isn't even unified, and some groups do this, while others do that? In any case, a lot to think about here.
I have always vaguely thought that the Solaren church was a group that had a problem with Vatican II and is basically the St. Pius Society if they went Wahabi - not necessarily all of them are terrorists, but it is an ideology that is extreme, religiously reactionary and might be explicitly or implicitly promoting Jihadism/Crusaderism depending on whom you ask. I think there is also a more Cathar-like interpretation by Cervia, where they have been around for a while.
My proposal would be that others write their understanding as well, so that we can then synergize the movement's nature into a post/wiki article. It might well turn out to be an umbrella of movements, just like ISIL and AQ have in large parts become franchise terror brands under which anyone willing to claim association can act.
