I am RE-re-applying for the Loagto colony!!!! At least if there is a problem with the application, with it's backstory, it's fucked-up state or something else, tell me what to change, as I applied for it two updates ago.
I wrote those in the Saaremaan thread in the Cooperative Corner.
You must be registered for see links
I don't think that's necessary to solve this issue. The Carentanian Mezhists fled the country during the revolution (or rather: Mezhism was invented by the expatriates). Where you end up as refugee is not solely an issue of geography - especially as those refugees tended to be well-off or at least affluent middle-class people. They'd go to countries culturally similiar and politically tolerant of them. I guess that a conservative slavic country may have been more attractive that e.g. Solaren or Jurzan, which are geographically close but probably religiously intolerant of them, while countries like Eiffelland or Frescania may have been to liberal for their liking - or at least, their societies just didn't prove fertile ground for their ideology, which requires a troubled society with dominant conservative values for their national reawakening ideology to catch on in larger stratas of society.
To protect the fairness of our game, please make all requests for alteration to the map publicly. The Mapmaker will not make changes based on IRC, PM, Skype or any other private or offsite conversations. The Mapmaker cannot and will not accept requests forwarded anywhere other than official public map threads.
Quickly re-iterating:
I welcome such discussion, and would much rather prefer a total greening of Suionia and everything related to it if it allows me full freedom with Østveg. Yet, obviously such things pertaining to Suionia aren't in my control. The administration made it clear they would not green anything, and therefore we have to work with what is there. So if opening a discussion on the topic, I'd like to hear suggestions for what to do with it. Am I being asked to Prop 10 it more to make it a valuable part of our community? Or am I being asked to campaign to have it greened? Or am I being asked to formally give creative license to some one else so they can impartially move forward with it?
Decision of the Staff:
Suionia will not be greened because it is still viewed to be essential to the Bantyr scenario, which is a part of the active and ongoing Frescania scenario. Greening it would undermine an active player who relies on that decision point as important to its history.
Allowing coro/Østveg to prop-10 the nation he was suspended from playing is not possible either, however, as it would undermine the message of the ruling at the time. Other players are encouraged to prop 10 NPC's in these peculiar situations, and we have the unique opportunity of having Coro actually still here to give general image or intricacy pointers for prop-10 scenarios, but not a commanding or self-written dictation.