Khalistan Era :- Map Versions L.1-3.25

[Catalina]

Map spot: B3

Capital City: Portland, on the coast of the inlet in that gulf.

 

[Khalistan]

An Old Look For The New Map

I have been working on a new look for the map, I would like your opinions which you like best or prefer the present style.


#1. Old Fashion Framed

You must be registered for see links

#2. Old Fashion Unframed

You must be registered for see links

#3. Ragged

You must be registered for see links

#4. Present Style

You must be registered for see links

 

[Khalistan]

I am sorry for being away for so long, but there has been some RL problems that needed to be taken care that took longer than expected. There will be a new map out tomorrow.

In the meantime, take a look at the link below and tell me what you think.

You must be registered for see links

 

[Potenza]

If we were a pirate or 18th century RP, I might vote for #3, but I think #1 is more suited for our purposes.

 

[Breotonia]

Argh, there be booty on that map!

 

[Jydsken-Østveg]

Honestly it doesn't matter. Whatever you like best to continue updating the map in a timely fashion.

 

[Catalina]

^Agreed

 

[Remuria]

#4

 

[Danzig]

For looks #1, for functionality, #4.

 

[Josepania]

It's "framed" or "unframed" not "frammed" or "unframmed"[/GrammarNazi]

As much as I love #3 and would love to see it be the norm, I'll cast my vote for #1 as #3 will probably not win at this rate.

 

[Polesia]

I don't really see the need for the antiquated look, we're a modern day nation roleplaying forum so I suggest keeping the present version. Also when's this supposed new map making an appearance?

 

[Guiana]

I do like the old fashion look, especially #3, though #1 is probably the best compromise that and the present style, but if you do go with the old fashion look, you might want to better define the coastal regions, especially the non-claimed islands as they seem to blend into the background.

 

[Khalistan]

Updated.

 

[Khalistan]

It's "framed" or "unframed" not "frammed" or "unframmed"[/GrammarNazi]

As much as I love #3 and would love to see it be the norm, I'll cast my vote for #1 as #3 will probably not win at this rate.

I can't believe I did that.

I don't really see the need for the antiquated look, we're a modern day nation roleplaying forum so I suggest keeping the present version. Also when's this supposed new map making an appearance?

I thought I would do something different. If I do go with the antique look, it won't go into effect until April 1st.

I do like the old fashion look, especially #3, though #1 is probably the best compromise that and the present style, but if you do go with the old fashion look, you might want to better define the coastal regions, especially the non-claimed islands as they seem to blend into the background.

I see what you mean. I will fix that before the map it adopted.

 

[Danmark]

My own opinion is that if we were to adopt an old map, that No. 2 would be better. The border is less intrusive and does not detract from what should be the highlight - the map. No. 1 has a border that is too imposing even if it looks 'neat'.

Ultimately though, No. 4 or a modernisation of that would be better as this is a (by and large) modern Europe.

 

[Tulus and Biminis]

I honestly don't care so long as I'm put on the damn thing.

 

[Tulus and Biminis]

Glad to be on the map. Would it be possible for me to border Vangala at all? I wouldn't even mind a 'pan handle' sort of like one Afghanistan has. It would deeply help some RP ideas.

 

[Remuria]

This request is still actual, so reposting before it is forgotten in the vagaries of posts and threads.

I'd like the following city amendments:

You must be registered for see links

1. Moving Einsiedeln a bit more to the east, where the new red dot is located. This would correspond to the placing on the detailed national map. NOT CRITICAL. So don't bother if you feel it will clutter too much.

2. Adding the city of Elbebruck to the border between Wendmark and Wiese. This modification I insist upon. The city is is trans-national, spans both countries and hosts the HQ of the Germanian League. So rather important. I think Wiese won't mind if you span the name over his country a bit.

 

[Polesia]

Glad to be on the map. Would it be possible for me to border Vangala at all? I wouldn't even mind a 'pan handle' sort of like one Afghanistan has. It would deeply help some RP ideas.

I'd welcome Karakhstan sharing a border with Vangala. As much as I enjoy RPing with Yujin, it would be nice to have another person immediately by to interact with.

 

[Tulus and Biminis]

You must be registered for see images

I would appreciate the following cities be added to the map if possible.

Also, if there are no objections, could the gulf on my coast be named the 'Gulf of Aral' ?


I would also like to inquire if it would be possible to change the ownership of the colony below, which was given to my former country, Batavië. I had these islands made as a relic of the old Batavian trading empire. With my new incarnation these would be a small outpost of the country discovered many years ago by a nomadic sea-faring type, long since extinct in Karakhstan. The details will be drafted soon.

You must be registered for see images

If accepted the name for the island group would be: Nova Kyril
Capital (in same spot): Semey